welcome

Parents of lost babies and potential of all kinds: come here to share the technicolour, the vividness, the despair, the heart-broken-open, the compassion we learn for others, having been through this mess — and see it reflected back at you, acknowledged, understood.

subscribe
search
Powered by Squarespace
« birthing a dying child | Main | prayer of a babylost parent »
Monday
Jan042010

reflections on baby photos: three voices

1 :::

Several weeks after Sadie died my sister-in-law had the first picture we took of her painted on canvas for us. It is a beautiful shot taken as I held her for the first time, all chubby cheeks and serene newness.

It has been a focal point sitting on our bedroom mantle ever since. Most mornings I send a quick I love you, Munchie towards it before heading off to work. There have been times that I’ve sat on my bed in front of it, sobbing under the weight of how much I miss her.

My brother took my second favorite photo. In it Sadie is sleeping in her father’s arms. The pose of her tiny little fist curled up under her chin like a miniature, tired old man makes me smile. I’d probably have a wall-sized mural of it instead if I didn’t think it’d have every guest running for the hills, calling me a whacko over their shoulder as they went.

The honest truth is that I struggle between that sentiment and a lingering guilt over not having enough of them up.

The strength of our love for her merits having her image splayed across every surface we own. So why the hell should I worry about whether or not it makes our dinner guests fidget in their seats?

We probably took several hundred photos of Sadie over the course of her six weeks with us. At any point I can open those files and look back for as long or as little that I care to. They allow me to remember every curve of her perfect face. The video clips remind me of how hilarious we found it when she grunted her way through a poop. They allow me to grieve as and when I choose.

These images we keep tell our heartbreaking truth: that along with our memories, they are all we have left.

~ Jen

 

2 :::

Our only pictures of Silas are from when he was still in Lu's womb, and after he had passed away. His presence was too brief and traumatic to capture while he was alive

It is almost impossible for me to look at photos of Lu while pregnant, but I need to see his beautiful and serene face in the collage Lu created in the months after he left us. In it he is newborn and perfect, a gorgeous little kid. The photo was taken by the hospital staff and given to us in a box along with imprints of his hands and feet in clay and in ink, a lock of his hair, the tiny hat he wore at the hospital and several other beautiful photographs of him.

There is absolutely no question that this collage or a photograph of Silas will always be displayed in our house. He was our child and although we did not get to have him long, the physical presence of his life and existence is vitally important to us. Frankly, I've never for a moment considered any other arrangement, or even if having his photo displayed would make guests feel uncomfortable.

Just the idea that someone would want for us to do this differently to make them feel better makes me extremely upset.

It is our choice to remember our son openly and honestly in our home. If any friend or family had any other opinion they would be well served to keep that entirely to themselves. It is up to them to deal with their own inability to face reality and not at all my problem.

In the framed collage Lu created is his photo, the ink imprints of his hands and feet, a haiku I wrote about missing him, a photograph of his name written in the sand on the beach at sunset, photographs of the tattoos Lu and I both have in his honor, and a small print of the constellation Orion, his middle name. It is not nearly enough or anywhere what we deserve but it is what we have, and somehow, it will have to do.

~ Chris

 

3 :::

What I think about displaying pictures of dead babies in one's house is that no-one but the parents gets to have an opinion on this. A picture, bazzillion pictures, where, how-- none of this is up for discussion. Anyone who doesn't like what the parents do is welcome, and is hereby courteously invited, to shut the fuck up. People's homes, coincidentally much like their grief, are theirs. Both are about them and their family, not about anyone else's idea of what's done or what's proper. Even when an anyone else in question is a close friend or relative. Particularly when it's a close friend or relative.

You'd think that with attitude like that I'd have at least a couple pictures of A up around here. But we have none. Back then my hospital didn't offer contact information for NILMDTS photographers. Even if they did, I don't think at the time we would've been comfortable letting a stranger into that room. Scratch that-- I know I wasn't. It bugs me now, because now I would be. And because what we ended up with are the few pictures my sister took with my blackberry. The quality isn't great. It's not awful either, but it's not great.

I've edited some of the pictures we have, cropped, played with effects. Over the years, I posted two of these edited photographs on my blog. I have all of them, original set and my edits, on my laptop. I can look whenever I want to.

There were stretches of time when I looked every day, sometimes several times a day. But there have also been stretches of months when I haven't looked at all. Not because I "moved on" or any such platitude. I think of A every day, I miss him all the time. But I don't need to see the pictures all the time.

All of these things are true, but none of them are the real reason we don't have the pictures up. The real reason is that parents is plural. There's two of us in this, and JD didn't want the images displayed. He doesn't usually look at them either. He doesn't need to. Not to remember, not to love, not to grieve, and not to miss. I think, truthfully, that in the photographs JD sees too much of his own pain, that the pain he sees clouds the beautiful baby whose pictures those are. I think he sees more clearly in his mind's eye.

And so we don't have any photographs up. What we do have are the two framed drawings of Monkey's, family portraits both. One she started while A was still alive, all of us lined up in front of our house, A with a hypothetical future dog. She had done the outlines in pencil and had started on coloring it in with markers before A died. In the days following our return from the hospital, cleaning her room with her, we stumbled upon the drawing. I asked if I could have it, and she said no-- she would finish it and we would hang it on the wall, for everyone. Finishing the drawing was hard on her. It took her weeks, and in the end some of the coloring is sloppy, too sloppy for what she was normally doing back then, and in darker colors than her usual palette.

The second is the portrait she did in art class last year. It's in paint and is fairly impressive artistically, for a seven year old. As in, for example, people have recognizable features. There are two small boys in that one. Nearly identical, with one slightly larger than the other. She proclaimed the larger one to be A, and the smaller (duh!) the Cub. The boys in the painting are holding hands.

So this is the idiosyncratic place our little family finds itself on the pictures thing.  But like much else in this whole babylost experience, it is not etched in stone. A's actual photograph might still end up on a wall in our home. For a while now I have been thinking about creating a collage type arrangement in one frame, floating or otherwise, with pictures of all three of my kids. I think I want to have something of all of them together, since, you know, I can't have all of them together. I am not sure when I'd do it, or how, yet. I was thinking of using the picture of A's hand in mine, but I am not sure what pictures of Monkey and the Cub to use with that. So it might end up being a picture where you can see A's beautiful little face, or maybe both. See how figured out I am?

And if I do manage to make something that I like, I don't know where I would want to put it. In my office, where most wouldn't see it, or somewhere more conspicuous? It depends. Depends on what it comes out looking like-- too tender and intimate to share with just anyone or something I am ok with people seeing? And depends, of course, on how JD will feel about it. I guess, again like so much in this strange world of ours, we will figure it out when (if) we get there.

~ Julia

 

How do you feel about displaying photos of your baby in your home or in other personal spaces? If you've chosen to feature them in your life, how have your photos been met by loved ones and friends? What do photographs of your child mean to you?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (29)

I have pictures of my son, who was stillborn at 37 weeks, 4 days in my livingroom.

I remember J was not in favor of having pictures of Fionn on our mantle pieces initially but that changed within a few days of us coming home.

I carry a picture of my son in my wallet, too. I don't look at his picture (conciously), everyday. Some days I do. I look at all the pictures (hundreds) we took in the hospital during the 24 hrs he was with us. And if I get to talk to someone, tell someone about him and us and the fact that we lost him (which tends to happen only really if a stranger asks whether I have any children or not), I sometimes (very rarely) take out the picture from my wallet and show it to the person, if I think the conversation is able to handle it...

Most people I know in Ireland were keen and interested to see pictures of Fionn in the early days, they even asked for pictures, they didn't cringe, some compliment his looks, some got very emotional and some cried or just went very silent. But they somehow could deal with the loss and the pictures in a way that is neither offensive nor intrusive.

In another country (where I come from - I have no idea whether that's a refection of the people there enlarge or just my circle of people; I choose to see it as the later) there are very few people who want to see a picture of my son, two very old, close friends to this day (18 months later) refused outright to look at them.
My father has one picture I gave him of myself holding Fionn hidden in an envelope somewhere. He says he can't look at it, it pains him to much.

I try not to judge people about how they deal with my pictures. But it did hurt. Now I just see the differences in people and choose those people who are not hurting me over the ones that do. Kindred by choice...

I love the pictures we have of our son. They make me proud. And they make me long to hold him again. I'm ok with that.
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterines
I have no pictures. Not because I wouldn't have wanted them - I know I would have wanted them. My losses were all so early and some so unexpected that all I had were the ultrasound photos for a couple of them, some not even that because there hadn't been enough time. One of my babies we had a heartbeat, then the next time we went in, her heartbeat was gone. I knew they had those ultrasound photos and I wanted them, I asked for them. The gal at the desk was unsure - my doctor told her to give me ALL of them, save one for my file. I have them still. Every little shred of evidence that proved that my babies I lost were real I clung to - even down to the hospital bills from my d&cs and for a while, the positive pregnancy tests. It was all I had - all I would ever get, and I needed it. Then there was the great and total meltdown and I literally tore apart the pregnancy tests and even burned the hospital bills - but did save those ultrasound photos, a pregnancy calendar started - but not finished, and one mock birth announcement for my baby to be (who no longer was) that in true lousy timing fashion arrived the day after I came home from the hospital drugged and bleeding from a d&c. I haven't done it yet - but have always planned on making a framed collage of all my ultrasound photos - the ones of the babies I got to keep as well as the ones I did not; and yes, it will be displayed.

"It is our choice to remember our son openly and honestly in our home. If any friend or family had any other opinion they would be well served to keep that entirely to themselves. It is up to them to deal with their own inability to face reality and not at all my problem."

I love this quote!! Too often I felt like I had to apologize to everyone else for the discomfort my loss caused them. Why did I have to make them feel better? Why should I have to make concessions in my grieving toward that end? Ridiculous! Mourning is intensely personal - there is no "right" nor "wrong" way, no one size fits all model for grieving. You do what you have to do to survive and no one else can tell you how to do that. We all have to find our own way.
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJuliaS
We have two pictures of Maddy in our family room (one next to a bowl that contains her remains), and about 4 or so on the mantle in our bedroom. I've toyed with having a a portrait person I know turn the one of me holding her into a larger oil, but like Julia said -- my husband is still a bit uncomfortable with this, and it's his issue too. Ergo, I see them daily, but they don't always register if you know what I mean. Some days there's a pause, or an "I miss you" said into the air, but some days I just dust around them like I do all the other photos.

Interestingly (or not?), I have a slew of photos of her right after she was born, and also about 14 series of u/s pictures and I can't stand to look at any of them and haven't in years. For me, they represent some lie -- someone who she really wasn't, a trick, a sleight of hand. The real Maddy, the one I knew, has tubes up her nose and and IV and that's the one I chose to view and reflect on. They're all tasteful and not scary remotely (no needles visible, her color is fine), but honestly I really don't give a crap what people think. She's our daughter -- our other family members are visible throughout our house, so why not her?
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered Commentertash
"What I think about displaying pictures of dead babies in one's house is that no-one but the parents gets to have an opinion on this. A picture, bazzillion pictures, where, how-- none of this is up for discussion. Anyone who doesn't like what the parents do is welcome, and is hereby courteously invited, to shut the fuck up" AMEN!!!!!!!!!!! and thank you.

We have a couple of pictures up. And above our kitchen table, where the entire family gathers for dinner, our each of our children surrounding our wedding photo. Our stillborn daughter was not in good condition when she was born, and our of respect TO HER (I wouldn't want a photo of myself, looking very dead, displayed in anyone's home) she is represented by an ultrasound photo. We also have a picture of her sister (who died as well) in her incubator. I have the same incubator pic on my keychain.
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered Commentersarai
I think to display or not display pictures of one's dead baby/ies is, as Julia noted, entirely up to the bereaved parents, period, end of story. If the parents feel the images are disturbing or that displaying them would be disrespectful to the child/ren, then that is their decision. If the parents want to display the images of their child/ren, in an altered or unaltered form, that is their decision and anyone who has a problem with it has the option to look somewhere else. I've noticed that in many of the babyloss blogs I read, parents are defensive about their decision to display pictures or not (and in some cases, to take them at all or not). I know it's the asinine remarks that stand out but there are also some of us who have no first-hand experience with babyloss and would never dream of judging one way or another.
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMFA Mama
It's funny you should ask that. We are having guests over for my husband's birthday next week and I was just looking around my house wondering what people think about all the pictures of my daughter. They are everywhere and I mean everywhere. People have said to me in the past that they like that our home reflects our love for our daughter, though they don't often come out and say it directly but wait till certain times to talk about it. Sometimes I catch people staring at the cabinet where her ashes are, they think I am not noticing. They don't realise I would like nothing more for them to go up to it and ask me questions about why the objects in their are special to us.

I like having her photos up in our home, they comfort me, but I do wonder if people think it's unhealthy, that we are dwelling. I know its not but I don't like people thinking that way.
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterSophie
I struggle with how I feel about the pictures of my daughter, Sierra. She was stillborn at 27 weeks and 5 days due to placental insufficiency and severe intrauterine growth restriction. A day or so after she was born, my husband was talking to his mother on the phone, on speaker phone so I could hear too, and she asked him if Sierra was beautiful. He answered, "Not really." I jumped in and qualified it somehow - she was tiny, and thin, and preterm, and well, you know, dead, but she looked like my mom and my husband and I'm sure she would have been beautiful if she'd survived.

At the last meeting of the support group I go to, I was trying to explain how I struggle with the pictures. I said that she isn't really beautiful in the pictures; she's wrinkly and so painfully small and thin, and the person she most looks like is my 95-year-old grandma - and we all laughed. But on the drive home, I cried, feeling like I'd betrayed my daughter by saying that and allowing people to laugh at her looks. Now I think I want to share her picture with the group - or at least the few people I'm closest to - but I'm not sure.

I have shown the pictures to family members and close friends and I always warn them before I hand over the album - she was preterm, she suffered IUGR so she's very thin, she was gone for a few days before she was born so her skin is wrinkly...and I always feel a bit shy and more than a bit protective. I don't want anyone else to say that our daughter isn't beautiful, even if we say it ourselves. The people who have looked at my pictures have told me that they wanted to see and none of them has upset me with their response, but most of them don't say much beyond how small she is. I do have one wonderful friend, though, the one who has been so supportive and always known what to say even though she hasn't been through babyloss herself, who told me that she did think Sierra was beautiful because she was my baby, but also that she didn't think beautiful or not was the right question to ask. She said she thought Sierra just looked like Sierra - that's who she was and who she will always be - and somehow that was what I needed to hear and what comforts me most. She is Sierra and she looks like herself.

But I still struggle - with how thin she was, how tiny and unready to be outside my womb, and the changes death caused in her body before I ever saw her. And I think pictures of preterm dead babies are especially difficult for other people to deal with. So I don't have any pictures of her displayed, but I do have her hand and footprints on my desk at work, and I'm thinking of making a collage with the hand and footprints and ultrasound pictures of both Sierra and my (living) son to display in our house.

Sorry this got so long - it is something I've been thinking about a lot recently. Perhaps I should post it on my own blog...if I do, and it gets even longer (which it could), I'll come back here and post a link. Looking forward to reading more discussion of this...
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterErika P
Right now I have 2 pictures up in our home. One of our daughter and one of me cradling her. I definitely plan on putting more up and I am even going to have a special place in the house for all her things. I carry pictures in my purse, including a little booklet of her NILMDTS photos. I also have photos hanging up at work both at my work station and on my locker. I love having her pictures around and I honestly don't care what anyone thinks about them. Don't like it then don't look.
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterHolly
I did not bring a camera to the hospital, & have regretted it ever since. I have six lousy Polaroids taken by the nurses. In three, you can't even see Katie's face. The other three are awful. They are horribly taken & I think they make her look worse than she really did. But of course, they are precious, because they are the only photos we have. They are proof that she existed.

I do not have any of the three photos where you can see Katie on display. They really are awful photos, & I would just die if I overheard or heard about anyone making any less-than-favourable cmments. I have one photo (of me holding Katie & dh & my mom looking at her) framed & sitting on top my bedroom cupboard, along with some other Katie-related things (a music box, a Boyds Bears figurine, etc.) and her ultrasound photo in a beautiful frame I found that has the caption underneath "We dreamed of you." Also a quilt square that a friend/bereaved mom made for us.

At work, I have a Precious Moments figurine of a little angel holding up an August birthstone sitting on my desk, in lieu of a photo.

I have many friends who have lost babies who display photos openly in their homes. I agree with everyone above. Their homes, their choice.
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterloribeth
I've already responded at length in the discussion thread about this, but will summarize briefly.

We do not yet have pictures of Gabriel displayed, but will soon. We took a long time to decide what to do about them, and comfort level for both of us was a big thing. From the very beginning, a photographer friend offered to edit the pictures and have them professionally printed/matted/framed for me and we finally decided to take her up on it.

There are nine pictures; I wish we'd taken more. I wish I'd insisted on having a picture of my husband holding Gabriel. There is one really beautiful picture of him, where he looks like a normal, sleeping baby - if very tiny. And of course, his skin is quite thin, since he was born at 21 weeks. But in that picture, he might still be alive. It's not threatening or scary, as some of the others are, it doesn't give away just how tiny he really was (the others all do in some way). It simply shows how much like his father he looked, how he had my nose and lips. We're having that picture made separately and it will sit in our living room, on our mantle, next to the box containing his ashes.

For the wall of family pictures, in the stairwell, we are having a collage done, which will show my most precious picture - the last one we took, where lividity is beginning to set in, where the slackness and death is very apparent, but which was the last one, moments before he was taken away and shows all his perfect, gorgeous little body. That is the scary picture, and it's going in anyway, with others - one of me holding him, a close up profile, and his name, and copies of his footprints, his birthdate. I'm not sure how it will look in the end, but it won't be terribly visible on the stairs, as no one ever goes up there but us.

I believe in doing what is right for you, the parents, in your own home. That is one area in which I choose not to compromise my grief, you know? For us, that means showing Gabriel and not pretending he didn't exist, and anyone who is uncomfortable can shove it.

Despite the grand talk and my take-no-prisoners belligerence on the topic of my home, I have been extremely protective of his picture in general. I have only offered to show it to family and close friends - people who will see him as our son, and not be turned off by the tiny being, the thin skin, the clear signs of death in the later pictures. I didn't put them on my blog, I didn't make them available on Facebook, I didn't put them out there and I haven't allowed everyone to see them.

Because of that, it's stung a bit more when someone has chosen not to see them - as my sister has, my mother-in-law recently did, as a couple of friends did. I get it logically (and even emotionally about 85% of the time) - sometimes they have an image in their head they don't want to replace, sometimes they don't know what they will see and are scared by that unknown. Sometimes they are afraid of the wrong reactions and saying or doing something hurtful (what if they grimace? what if they gasp or there is horror in their eyes they can't hide? what if they can't find anything nice to say?). Everyone who has seen them has told us he was beautiful and mentioned their favorite picture and picked out features that came from me or my husband.

I think that is what gave us the courage to go ahead and be true to ourselves, knowing that the people who care see the same thing we see.
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered Commentereliza
There are areas of my house that could be described as "shrine-like". We have many photos of Hope up around our house, in several different places. I know there are some people who have been uncomfortable with it, I can see it written all over their faces as soon as they walk in here.
She was stillborn at 40 weeks 5 days and had been dead more than 24 hours inside me by the time she was born, but I am one of the "lucky" ones, in that most of the photos we have are pretty delicate and were taken by an excellent NILMDTS photographer. Or am I just saying that because I'm her mother? Hard to know. I know I can see past her dead-ness when I look at the photos. She just looks like my baby. My precious little first born baby girl.
At first, I emailed her photo to anyone and everyone, even if they might not have wanted to see her. I figured if I had to go through the trauma of losing her and birthing her dead body, others could do us the courtesy of simply looking at her picture and telling us what we wanted to hear - that she was so beautiful. I didn't get many objections and most did in fact say she was beautiful, even if they believed otherwise, but I had one person refuse to look at her when I tried to show her a picture in person. That really did sting. I have heard anecdotally some others didn't look at the birth annoucement/thank you cards we sent out, saying it was too hard for them.
One of our grandparents has a photo of Hope in a frame at her house, so I assumed that all the other grandparents might like the same. So I sent my grandmother a small framed black and white photo of her, and it made her hysterically upset, and not only would she not put it up, she would not look at it. I have no idea where that framed photo is now, but I really do hate to think.
Now that we have our living son in our lives, people have started to ask if we'll put some of his photos up. We don't really have any up yet (granted he's only 7 weeks old) but I figure he's here. I can look at HIM all day. I don't need photos up of him like I do of her.
Because with her, photos is all I'll have. And like Chris said, somehow that will have to do.
January 5, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterSally
We have pictures up in our home, here where I'm sat typing there are two next to my monitor, one just as she was born (alive) and one in my arms with my husbands arms around us both taken by the midwives after she died.
We also have a large framed photo we can see from our bed, a painting from a photo by a dear friend, two framed photos of her name in the sand, her foot prints, and two further photos all on display around the house.
My husband has photos in his wallet and a lock of her hair, I carry a photo on my keys,in my purse, and in a locket around my neck.
No one has ever suggested we shouldn't do any of these things, infact a friend came over and commented that we had no photo in our lounge, and she thought we needed one. (we do now)
We are lucky I guess that we have four precious photos taken before her collapse and while she was still attatched to me, so I get the choice when showing photos of whether to show alive (albeit on a naked me!) or dead photos.
Most of the photos taken after Florence died are not scary, but there are some only my husband, children and I have seen. Some where she looks obviously dead, and well they are just so desperately sad, and I feel the need to protect those.
A few weeks back a kindly woman at school asked me how I was doing and asked to see photos, I was so thrilled, and told her so. She cried when she saw them,but she told me how beautiful my daughter was, and was pleased to have seen her. I love her for that.
January 6, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJeanette
I don't have any pictures and I'm very, very glad that I don't have any pictures.

Because, while, I'd never criticize or second guess the different choices of other parents, photos of babies (whether dead or just sleeping) are a trigger for me. I force myself to look at them and try to say the right things, but it's very painful.
January 6, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterniobe
We have small pictures of Gabriel, most of them in our room, on my husband's dresser. I know we have a retouched 8 x 10 somewhere in our house, probably in the Gabriel box. They were taken at the hospital, some as we were holding him. My BIL retouched them; Gabriel's journey from my womb was not exactly a gentle one.

I never thought of displaying them. Or not displaying them. The 8 x 10 was on display at his funeral/memorial service.

I have posted his picture on my blog.

Now I am thinking of finding that 8 x 10, of displaying with other pictures of our family, our girls, ourselves.

Julia, your description of what Monkey did made me cry. My older daughter, Flora, has drawn "our family"-type picures. Sometimes there are 5 people in it; sometimes 4. Either way, it's a bit of a heart punch.

I am really touched by all these thoughts. Thank you.

rpm
January 6, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterred pen mama
Oh, I wanted to add, about the NILMDTS photographers: I had heard a story on NPR about them, and I have seen their work. It is beautiful. I wonder now if we would have had one in the room with us when Gabriel was finally delivered.

I don't know the answer to that question.

Also, both sets of Gabriel's grandparents have small pictures of him on display. In my parents' house, it is a little more in the open; in my ILs house, it is set off in the guest/clothes storage room. I am touched in both cases that they have the photo.

rpm
January 6, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterred pen mama
Pictures of dead relatives line the walls of the homes of many. What makes it any less important to have picture of your dead child lining the walls I ask? If you aren't uncomfortable seeing the face of a now deceased Grandmother or Grandfather, then why a little baby that never got to grow up?

I would hang pictures of my lost baby if I had any. S/he was just too little, only 12 weeks, when I lost her/him. I wish I had of had a picture.....

Display them proudly Momma and Daddys. They are your pride and joy, in life and in death.
January 6, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAnom.
I wish I had more than a scan picture. (I have four - three at 11+5, alive; one supposed to be at 17 weeks in which the baby only measures 13 weeks; dead.)

(I wish I'd looked at the baby when it came out of me. I was too scared at the time. What was I scared of?)

And I wish that it wouldn't upset my husband to see the pictures. But it would, and it's his house too, so they live in a box, not out on display. My mum's the only one to have seen the dead scan pic. I wish other people would offer, but I think... maybe I'll start showing it to people anyway. It makes it more real.

Sometime soon, I'm going to print a tiny version of one of them for my wallet.
January 6, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterB
I have several pictures of my Jenna all over my living room and kitchen. I intend to put some in her brother's room too. These pictures are hard for me to look at because they rehash the guilt I feel for the pain she might have endured, but aside from that, they are some of the most precious things I own. I was actually thinking today what if my laptop got stolen and all her pictures would be forever lost!? I have decided I am going to make copies just in case... that thought really shook me up. As for peoples' reactions... some have been delighted to see her up on the wall, others just glance and say nothing. I also have her picture in a window on my purse (scrapbook/art bag) and I have caught people just staring. I have no idea what they are thinking. I could honestly care less. I WANT the whole world to see her, and realize that she is very much a part of me and my family.
January 6, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterFranchesca
We were able to take several photos of Teddy the day after he was born. I still struggle with the fact that the photos taken of him while he was alive have so many tubes obscuring his face, while the ones that show all of his face are ones taken after he died. But I love all of these photos, and I still look at them often.

It's still incredibly hard for N to look at these photos, though. I don't know if we'll be displaying them openly any time soon. Plus, I'm very protective of these images - they're so very precious to me and I can't show them to people lightly. What we have on our walls now are framed photos of some of the roses from the rose garden we visited four days before Teddy was born. They remind us of him, but in a way that we both can handle.
January 7, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterErica
we have a few awful, but precious photos, taken on a crappy disposable film camera in our "darkened for dying" corner of the NICU. they are blurry and i am terribly sad i'd never heard of NILMDTS at the time. when we developed the film, turned out the nurses had taken a few more, but they were equally blurry, too close or too far, and were taken obviously awhile after he died, maybe by the next morning's shift. the lividity in his face is evident, and the strange Victorian poses they set him up in make me sad, if fascinated. fascinated b/c of the "life" his body went on to have, unknown to us...in these unexpected photos, posed rather morbidly - yet with sweet intentions, i assume - with a teddy bear. i figure they shot these while they prepared our memory box. mostly they make me wish i'd a) had a decent camera and photographer and b) known that he could stay with me, for that period of time. but we'd been awake 24 hours. we went upstairs to sleep at 5am. and so he was alone, until they brought him to me one last time later that morning. and the loneliness i project onto those photos makes them something i would never display, even if they didn't also make me feel the protectiveness others mentioned, b/c they are not "pretty."

the only shot we have up in the house is in our bedroom, his little foot, and my finger.
January 7, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterBon
I am struggling with this a lot. I have a couple dozen photos of Isaac that I'm slowly putting into a scrabook with all the cards people sent, his footprint and his birth record, my hospital bracelet, etc. I've shown his picture to several of my friends--everyone has been very supportive, and said he was beautiful and looked just like his daddy.

My mother has a small picture of him on her desk at work, and a handful of framed photos in her bedroom. For the first few months I carried a small photo album with me everywhere--now (6 months out) I have a couple of pictures of him on my cell phone.

I have two sets of photos--one of his face, the other of his body. Only Mom, MIL and I have seen those, out of respect for Isaac. His deformities weren't upsetting to us, but they are fairly severe and I don't want anyone to recoil from them.

He doesn't exactly look dead in some of the pictures, but he was still so tiny (24 weeks) that he does look thin and red and...unfinished is the only word I can think of. (There are a few where it's very obvious and I don't share or really look at those.) I have two very special ones; one is a black and white portrait (thank you, NILMDTS) of me holding my son, and it's the only thing I have that makes me feel like a mother. The other is a closeup of his face, and with the blankets wrapped around him and a little blue cap on his head, he looks most like a later-term baby.

DH never left my side at the birth, but he couldn't bring himself to see or hold our son, and still doesn't want to see the pictures. I respect this, and I understand and am not angry. I want our home to be safe for his pain as well as mine.

But I really,I really want to display my two special pictures in our house. DH has said it's really okay with him and he'll deal with it just fine if I need/want the pictures up. And I am caught in a catch-22 (of my own making), because even though I know he's willing and able to deal with it I can't make myself put them out there where DH can see them.

As for everyone else in our life--the vast majority of the people we're friends with are open, loving, and supportive about Isaac and would have no problem with it. We are incredibly blessed that way. And anyone besides DH who has a problem with pictures of OUR baby can leave OUR house.
January 7, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAbigail W.
I am honored to be a Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep photographer, and I'm so pleased that so many people have had the opportunity to be served by the organization and have had positive experiences. I've made this offer here once before on a previous post about photographs, and I'd like to make it again... I would be honored to retouch any photographs that anyone in this community has of their children. Post-production editing and retouching is a HUGE part of what we do. Loribeth, Sarai and anyone else who has photos taken by nurses or relatives, please feel free to email me and I'll see what I can do.

This probably goes without saying, but naturally, there would be no charge for this. I also want to say that I am completely comfortable retouching and working on any and all photos you might have. No matter how premature or sick your precious children were, I can handle it. It is my honor to do this work, and if I can help in any way, please let me know. My email address is gypsypeach@aol.com. I'm so sorry for your losses, each and all. Take gentle care, everyone.
January 8, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAngie
Also, if anyone is interested, several graphic designers- babylost parents who wanted to give back to NILMDTS- have created templates for beautiful, sensitive birth announcements for babies who only lived a short time or who were born still. The organization has made them available to photographers who wish to offer an additional service to the families we serve. If anyone would like help in creating something to announce and memorialize your children, I would be more than willing to share or customize the templates.
January 8, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAngie
I only very recently (last week) put a photo of Freyja on my blog. I have many beautiful photos of Kees and Jet, but they were taken when those gorgeous boys were alive - before they died. Freyja never lived outside my womb.

I was very protective of those few photos I had of Freyja. We kept them for ourselves only. Our families do not have photos of Freyja - although they have often asked.

Last week, more than 3 and a half years after Freyja was stillborn, I finally put a photo of her on my blog. She looks beautiful. She looks like her brothers. She looks like her father. Of my three children, she looks most like me.

I have photos of my 3 dead children all over my house. We have a whole wall in our entrance hallway which is covered only with photos of our children. Everyone always says what beautiful photos they are. Often they don't know that our children are dead. Sometimes I tell them. Sometimes I don't.
January 8, 2010 | Unregistered Commentermirne
Today is 2nd year aniversiry of my still born son, I came looking for support and I am glad I came! My son was born at 21 weeks and the pictures we have I hold sacred! I cant display them due to their "scary" nature and the fact I have older children that would be effect by them. I have chosen instead to display a picture of Christ holding a baby. I like to imagine that the baby is mine and that he is holding him until I have finished my work here on earth. I know that may be to much religion for some but it comforts me. To me, that is my picture of him! I miss him!

I have gone on to have a health son almost 5 months ago, he has helped the healing but he doesn't take the place of the child I've lost!

My heart goes out to all of the parents here, that like me miss and love a child that they never got a chance to hold alive. I like so many of you, the ultra sound pictures are more valuable then gold!
January 8, 2010 | Unregistered Commentercourtney
the first time i saw a picture of our son in a 'framed' setting was at my rent-a-mom's house (my own mother passed away years ago and my 'new' momma has stepped into my own mother's shoes perfectly.)

his picture was put into a christmas photo ornament hanging on her tree. she had access to the photos because after i gave birth to him, i didn't think i could bare having the photo album the hospital made me under my own roof. somehow, for some reason, i couldn't look at him my sweet first born. my son…

now three of my favorite shots are in plain view for all to see, sitting in a frame right next to his own little christmas tree. after the holidays a few friends stopped by for a quick visit. one of our friends was hovering around where the frame sits. she tried so hard to be 'smooth' about not actually looking at them, yet i could tell she wanted to see them. i hope she did get at least a little glimpse of our son. he's our little jem.

we were once so afraid, but now we're proud. we're proud of our little man and plan to keep him visible for all to see. he's our love and i don't care what ANYONE has to say. we're in love!
January 9, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterjulie
I have photos of my daughter. My husband is uncomfortable putting them out in our house, which actually makes me really sad. But what to do if it is a trigger for one person, and a source of comfort for the other? Lucy just looks, well, dead. Occasionally, my two year old will see me looking at them, and poke behind me and say, "Lucy is sick." I suppose she does look sick, Truthfully, I could not bear the judgment of someone else, so I am incredibly protective of them. I actually did try to share them with another dbm I know in real life, on her urging, trying to become more comfortable with that, and when I showed her she said, "Oh." And that was it. I am not sure she had ever seen a picture of a stillborn baby who had died a day or two before birth. I have never felt comfortable sharing them after that. I also sent them to one of those retouching services baby angel pictures, and never received anything back. Somehow I felt like it was a sign, even though I don't believe in signs, that they were for me. xo
January 10, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAngie
Well, after my comment got longer, longer and waaay longer... it turned into a blog-post itself.
http://myskytimes.wordpress.com/2010/01/09/from-the-sidelines-to-the-middle/
January 10, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterSkytimes
Alice was 20 weeks when she was born and died. She was tiny but perfect. We have many photos but I have never posted any. I have never showed them to anyone. She was mine, here for such a short time that I don't want to share her. I am completely selfish, I know. Its not that I am worried about what people will think or how they will react to a tiny baby, its simply that she is all mine. My husband does not look at the photos very often but I do.
January 10, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterRach

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.